Contrary to popular belief, evolution and creationism, aren’t mutually exclusive; moreover, it’s impossible for them to work this way, based on basic definition of terms in function of the philosophy.
Creationist belief, is the term of philosophy, of the self as God, when creating a new plant, insect, spider, mollusk, fungus, or animal, particularly for livestock, farming, consumption of food, or pesticide vermin, always on a macroeconomic scale.
Evolution, is the reference to natural development, as a corollary potential practice, to plant and animal husbandry, the development of one’s own family as observed by childhood and later parenting, in comparison to other families in social behavior at institutions of public practice.
Women, are necessarily raised atheist, so they can marry multiple men or have multiple suitors, a man converting to atheism when having a daughter, or if in mixed company, a removal from religious house of statute and belief, while involving himself in politics of town, to avoid clergy for sons or prostitution for daughters.
Men, meanwhile, have a fixed tradition of “God”, under terms of evolution, from father, passed down when God is questioned or inquired after, never with instruction (narcissistic homosexuality) or beating (control-oriented homicidal), and the smartest, denying God and discovering them in the field of maneuver (rejection of prior love interest of teenage years), or alternately, believing at the moment of instruction (a standard white collar career, an ablative, a counter-sociopathic, a sociopath being an individual who has cheated off someone else’s work and reported it as their own, or learned from it in a course of therapeutic treatment, a trap for the socially ill to accept it, even if within care, designed by “God” in the general term of sense, science; an institution where the test is upon belief, and always working if rejected, except by law, one’s own observation of return from action, audit of accounts in the technical sense).
Hence, you have evolution, the return and reminiscence of own culture, necessary for social interaction, and you have creationism, the design of a new contribution to society, for personal profit of family to move upwards in financial class (out of the five, designed by kingdoms identical due to success of model, for refusing to assist a sociopath, moved downwards a grade each time from a cultural alliance, until going to level six at the bottom, zero, you don’t have children, you’re gay, a child molester).
As for the universality of sexuality observed, we’ve had the same structures as above, since canines, as observed through the relationship between women’s liberation, our local sexuality that’s universal, and feminism, a foreign agent spreading a myth of a society’s treatment of women differing, each of them a member of a foreign enemy; if in the case of a canary work, a hero modeled after a famous cultural victory, we find those proclaiming someone the character, regardless of self, to be behind the attack or conspiracy against the country. This is called a canary, a contradictory query set in publication, such as Batman, Adolf Hitler.