Female Aristocratic Politics Primer

Ranks of Female Order: The rankings of women, rely on the involvement of a man, to act as an agent.  A woman that can not properly select a man, diminishes both herself and any man she is attached to, necessitating the man to reject the vast body of woman, already a mathematical boundary of non-probable events, and the woman to select aggressively and be capable of physical defense against women in non-proximity form.

Basic Theory: Power, for either a man or a woman, comes from the level of control in lethal force combined with the number of people under direct control, even if directed against another force.  Once a woman, is reduced to dependence on another woman, she can no longer control power, and if without male lover, spouse, or father of children attached, this is a certainty, with the male reduced if the woman falls, now a cuckold.  The woman, meanwhile, if reduced before attachment to a male is available, is a lesbian, a permanent attachment to a woman via her husband, only if not a cuckold.  Not recovery is possible.

Stages of Development:

Threat: The woman becomes aware of a threat, from a woman in a position of dominance, however is single, and available to a man who is not a cuckold.

Awareness: The man is then engaged by a cuckold, who is unattached, or “laid”, if attached, he is a ‘zoo’, a weak man that operates for sex alone, having given up secondary education for a ‘mouse’, a career without work ethic attached.  If a psychotic break is approached by her, she cuckolds herself, into a pederast.  If the relationship is brokered, she has selected a bull, a psychotic break through misfortune, and while she is still a pederast, she is now a ‘random’, a potential knife on a ‘queen’, a lesbian with a husband who is still active in a circle.

Dominance: The woman attains a man who is not reduced to a cuckold, now an active player in defending her.  If a woman approaches her, she is expected to tap him for help, to be used by her, in terms of his mother’s form of industry at peak achievement.  Otherwise, he is a ‘lame’, he has selected the wrong form of training in generalized form to achieve his career, secondary and separate, unless a ‘limbo’, a demeaner, a man who has not selected a method of career necessary to protect a woman.  If he refuses to aid the woman, he is now homosexual, he will haze himself.

Pressure: If a woman places pressure on the woman, she has two options.  She can call upon a knife, for a haze of the man attached to him, a potential crime she is culpable for, in men’s cultures, ‘bulls’, angry men that become obese in victory, or lames in defeat, or alternately, she can use her own ‘wills’, a simple battle of egotism dependent upon her own defeat, forcing the other side to use courts suit, for a token sum, provided by husband, taken from stipends of her own housing of power, separate from her husband’s influence over others.  This conjoins the enemy into the same social power ring, forcing them both into ‘scum’, otherwise known as pedophiles, thieves of children’s influence and social graces for whomever takes them into their trust.  Unless, of course, they are used as ‘paddies’, social boxing victims, for knives and alphas, the aforementioned assassin women and psychotic men that refuse to take a diminishment in social role, at the expense of power, known as ‘swords’ in this capable context.

Crime: There are three crimes possible, in women’s social.  Rape, social kindness, and pederasty of a child in care.  They escalate in severity of risk to achieve, and diminish in return or retaliation from attached male partners, however women’s rights always encloses women performing retaliation, making them costly to achieve without the collapse of the community possible, letting ‘lames’ take over as ‘stewards’, the ‘creep’, referring to the group plurality noun; a number of out-of-sights, those being foreign nationals, come in and start a ‘social movement’, known as a ‘plunger’; they talk about sexual experiences they find repulsive because they began sexual dominance behaviors in the swords killing the paddies.

Published by cheater120

Consider me an expert in information munitions. I practice Zazen meditation, Yakuza Trappist form (a Yakuza, games cheat, and Trappist, a counter-agent), as a Bonafuda, a mercantile salesmen of information through philosophy, literature, fiction, and academics, distributed as munitions technique deployed for the purpose apparent to you, unless of course you have violated the ethics of my piece, in which case you will be trapped inside a theft of the piece and an action within the boundaries of the violation you have committed in Benedictine culture, the Jewish affiliate within Catholic culture. Buyer beware, and these poems, are free.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: