What are, phonetics? They’re a misspelling, of phoenetics, the improper spelling being evidence of a change in literature to suit the simple, and the proper spelling being a reference to pronunciations varying from actual spelling of a word. They’re both important jokes to understand, but one should remember that phonetics is funnier than phoenetics, since one of them, is your job, and the other one, is your excuse not to work. Society shut down, so you don’t have to work, kid. That’s called ‘phonics’, a jingle from a teacher that figured out how to rebuild her mind after crack-cocaine addiction, similar to ebonics, a black presidential rumor placed on Fox News by MI-6 Zionists out of Rupert Murdoch’s share holding interest in simplified religion to gain a larger market share for his family’s personal whims to be approached as kings without limit, or queens without money, if you know New York (what does an improper capitalization mean, anyways, Eddie Murphy?).
Anyways, the formula is simple.
First, you pick a politician’s rival. This is your permanent keyset, a nickname that you are going to carry, with an inversion as to a downfall added every time someone tries to catch you.
Second, you pick the politician themselves, the leader you are scorning, as your violent response in your formula being spotted as a potential predatory victim, as the rival being seen through the eyes of the man empowered by your chosen politician, now temporarily becoming them in legacy of your viewpoint, the legacy to protect their custodial duty apparent.
Now, you take your rival, and you perform a written draft, based on a person you know personally, as the politician selected for legacy protection themselves. The person is placed within the context of a classic or popular literature or cinema or media or even a world politics piece or personality, however you add your own separate, dreary, dull day to it, in a story, for the narrative the work follows.
This stages out, to: personal politician invoked as victim of offended reader, legacy of rival politician to self with group protected in your view as an author, beating dummy of a person to form the negative personality traits in weakness of your view to induce pederasty in the reader towards the victim approaching them as the character, the media reference to get the art stolen, and the personal story hidden to make the media reference a non-notary, meaning the print was illegal for the printer, not you the writer.
And now, you’ve written Profiles in Courage, a trick that works this way anyways, a fine book. A Dark Side of Camelot (which of course, is art, known as blood fiending witchcraft, in King Arthur’s Day, Arturius of Monedale, a local knight’s court shut down for using art for homosexual wank parties between actors – there’s no point to an investment if there’s not money in it for use by purpose).